-breed specific legislation is harmful to the people because it increases the fear of that breed and the stigma that the breed carries and the majority of the time, that's all it is: a stigma. Such laws range from outright bans on the possession of these dogs, to restrictions and conditions on ownership, and often establishes a legal presumption that such dogs are dangerous or vicious. Proponents of these laws cite a number of reasons for supporting breed-specific regulations. For example, there were 207 deaths from pitbull attacks between 1982-2011, but only 22 deaths from Husky attacks, 12 deaths from German shepherd attacks, and 7 deaths from Doberman attacks. 2. Although she owns two German Shepherds, she argues that dog owners rationalize their dogs’ conduct, and that she is fed up with dog owners who intend their dogs to be “fuzzy guns. But pit bulls are still barred from living on military bases, and hundreds of breed-specific bans remain in place. The amount of energy spent on trying to exterminate breeds of dogs is not only entirely out of proportion to their actual risk, but also a poor appropriation of time and energy that could be spent on the issue of real concern: irresponsible owners. Good luck! UPDATE:: The top five most agressive dog breeds are 5. Many arguments against BSL made by Animal Farm and others concern the word “breed”. "Breed-specific" legislation (BSL) is the blanket term for laws that either regulate or ban certain breeds completely in the hopes of reducing dog attacks. The motivation of these dogs in choosing to bite, or the irresponsibility of the owners is not important. An Argument against Breed Specific Legislation. PRO argues that “all owners should be required to take a course to become licensed to own dogs.” The problem with this solution is that most breeds of dog don’t require special courses to own safely. Because pitbulls are not always properly trained, and because pitbulls cannot perfectly determine what is a real threat versus a perceived threat, innocent bystanders and animals become the victims of pitbull attacks. But, that time has not yet arrived. PRO notes that dog bite statistics may “fail to accurately show which dogs bite, why dogs bite, or describe just how frequently owners irresponsibly allow their dogs to become a problem to people or other problems.”. Breed specific legislation is a term referring to a set of laws enacted in order to protect the citizens of a community from dangerous dogs by categorising specific breeds as dangerous. The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) raises several other arguments against breed-specific laws such as: In order to avoid getting caught with a banned breed, dog owners may fail to get proper veterinary care for their animals, … By far, the most common breeds focused upon are the 'pit bull' type breeds. No one has time to read them all, but it’s important to go over them at least briefly. This type of legislation is usually enacted by local municipal or county governments and operates under the presumption that certain physical characteristics make some breeds of dogs more dangerous than others. It is well within the purview of the government to protect its citizens through legislation. PRO states that pitbulls excel in temperament testing and have well-respected military history. It’s National Pit Bull Awareness Month, a time to discuss Pit Bull type dogs and break down the myths and misconceptions that exist about the breed. It is the government’s job to recognize that a specific type of animal poses a generalized risk and protect against that risk. Stringent laws governing, preventing and/or restraining pit bulls have been passed in many states. “I am completely and absolutely opposed to breed ban and breed-specific legislation,” states Dr. Ha. Also, breed-specific legislation affects public safety. In June 2009, the Dutch government announced its intent to remove its “pitbull” ban after determining that it did not decrease dog bites or improve safety in the Netherlands. Breed-specific legislation refers to all laws that seek to restrict or eliminate ownership of certain animal breeds, most often dog breeds. Every year dozens of innocent infants and children are killed by pit bulls and people seriously injured through unprovoked attacked. The purpose of this legislation is to protect public safety by controlling ownership of potentially dangerous breeds of dog. If I purchase a Yorkshire terrier, I don’t need specialized training to protect myself and the public from my dog, because my dog doesn’t pose an inherent threat and is not innately likely to attack other people. This is thanks to vague and poorly founded Breed Specific Legislation or “BSL”. If all dog owners took appropriate care to train and socialize their dogs, breed-specific legislation would not be required, but because many owners do not undertake these efforts, the government must step in to ensure public safety. Breed Specific Legislation (BSL) is a legalized form of animal discrimination which is sanctioned by local governments. BSL is a stupid way to make people think they're doing something about a problem they really know nothing about. It would be reasonable for the government to require specific courses be taken for the ownership of pitbulls, but this would – by definition – fall under the category of breed-specific legislation which my opponent is arguing should be banned. Breed Specific Legislation (BSL) affects everyone. Attempts to justify discrimination against breeds labelled ‘pit bulls’ rely on one alleged factor that is supposed to distinguish those dogs from the rest: aggressive behaviour. Towns in Missouri, New Mexico and Cincinnatti have completely banned pit bulls and allowed county officers to confiscate and euthanize the dogs. Only an absolutely tremendous degree of misidentification of pitbulls could make this fact untrue, and my opponent has not shown that such a huge error exists, nor is there any reason to believe that it exists. Breed-specific laws harm rather than improve public safety. Well intentioned but irresponsible people who refuse to admit that their dog might be aggressive toward other animals. When the evidence supports that certain breeds of dogs present a public safety risk, it is within the government’s power to enact laws that will control the ownership of these breeds – whether through bans or restrictions. These governments have chosen to enact legislation that will limit or control these dogs, a completely reasonable and acceptable method of reducing this public safety risk. Arguments against. We need to inact legislation now at the constitutional federal level to alleviate this deadly problem in the United States. Not too long ago, I did a post about Sir Patrick Stewart and his pit bull, Ginger. Often seen as dangerous and untrustworthy, these dogs are judged, overlooked and discriminated against. I accept your debate. this was the final opening video for my power point presentation on an argumentative essay about pitbulls and BSL. The term “breed-specific legislation” is not one that comes up often in day-to-day discussion for most people. [1] These attacks vastly outnumber the attacks by other breeds of dogs. Pitbulls are bred to viciously and zealously defend their owners against real and perceived threats. In the United States, the A… According to the organization Responsible Dog Owners of the Western States , there are currently 75 … The Fort Lauderdale community has become hotly concerned about the “intimidating pit bulls” on the beachfront which are “scaring ‘family’ tourists” away. One of the unfortunate results of breed stereotypes, misinformation, and irresponsible ownership is breed-specific legislation, also known as breed discriminatory bans.For canine regulation, it is important to understand the differences between the two major forms of regulation - breed-specific legislation (BSL) and breed-neutral legislation (BNL). Temperament Rating and military accolades. Regulated breeds typically comprise the “pit bull” class of dogs, including American Pit Bull Terriers, American Staffordshire Terriers, Staffordshire Bull Terriers and English Bull Terriers. Some city/municipal governments have enacted breed-specific laws, as has the State of Ohio. Certain types of dogs, such as the pitbull or rottweiler, have a natural temperament toward aggression. Pit bull dogs have already been brought to the public’s attention as a threat, and such legislation is strongly supported by the American Kennel Club (AKC). Even though the Pit Bull breed was created to fight combining the Bulldog’s power with the Terrier’s tenacity and dog aggression, some folks just insist that “Scooter isn’t like that. What matters is that there is sufficient evidence for legislators to determine that pitbulls, rottweilers, and related dogs – relative to other breeds – present an abnormal risk to human safety. 2742 Words11 Pages. Around the world, governments are recognizing the inherent problems with BSL and revising their dangerous dog policies. Once revered as loving “nanny dogs,” pit bulls have lost their favored status of late. Without proper training and socialization, this temperament can become a problem and cause these animals to pose a threat to public safety. freebooksummary.com © 2016 - 2021 All Rights Reserved. People and parent’s of children should not have to be worried or concerned about this clear and obvious, yet blatantly irresponsible threat, when they innocently and casually go for a walk down the street or take a stroll on a public beach somewhere. By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. The real problem is uneducated, inexperienced people getting dogs they know nothing about. Many authorities say, "teach people dog safety, regulate by passing tougher civil and criminal laws, and restrict by keeping certain breeds away from the wrong people, places and situations." The dogs natural instincts kick in, the owner isn’t prepared for it, and someone gets hurt OR worse. I am against Breed Specific Legislation, in my opinion, it a product of the miseducation of the public at large. As we advance as a society, embracing compassion along the way must be part of the path forward. So, instead of banning the people responsible, the dogs get banned instead and everyone suffers for it. There recently was a world wide case that took place in Belfast Ireland, Lennox was a dog that was euthanized because he 'looked' like a pit bull. Breed-specific legislation has a negative impact on animal health It’s likely that the owners of dogs that meet the physical characteristics of banned dogs aren’t taking those dogs in for routine veterinary care, since they’re potentially afraid of their dog being identified. Pekinese 3. How about getting full access immediately? The ASPCA says that,“guardians of banned breeds may be deterred from seeking routine veterinary care, which can lead to outbreaks of rabies and other diseases that endanger communities. They are also fedup will this menacing threat. For example, Peg Jordan, an Oakland, California resident, was recently mauled by a pit bull and spent several days in the hospital with more surgery to come. Support for these laws is based on the misconception that pit bulls are more dangerous and prone to aggression than other dog breeds.. For any government to do this is wrong, granted that happened in Ireland, however the same laws exist here in the U.S.. Wow, well done, been a while since i had to pull research. The opponents argue that the legislation has acted erroneously with no adequate research to support the decision, as medical studies do not state breed as an influencing factor of viciousness. These bodies prohibit the ownership of certain dogs just because they may look like a certain type of animal. Posted on April 24, 2017 April 25, 2017 by alexb2448. He also comments that “because it wants to please, it will fight and protect the owner.” This is the problem. It nearly impossible … National Canine Research Council True; a properly raised, trained, and contained Pit Bull is no danger to the public. Despite that pitbulls and rottweillers represent only a small percentage of dogs, in the U.S. and Canada they account for 77% of all dog attacks that induce bodily harm, 73% of dog attacks to children, 81% of dog attacks to adults, 68% of dog attacks that result in death, and 76% of dog attacks that result in maiming. These breeds are generally either banned or prospective owners often need special permits that can be acquired after undergoing intense scrutiny. “…breed specific legislation may create an undue burden to owners who otherwise have demonstrated proper pet management and responsibility…Agencies should encourage enactment and stringent enforcement of dangerous/vicious dog laws.” Read the guidelines. Across the United States there is a trend that local governments, normally city or sometimes counties whereby they will prevent the ownership of certain types of dogs, most notably the "pit bull " breed. There is no civilized reason why they should have ever been selectively bred in the first place, they are nothing but vicious “killing machines,” and they should be constitutionally banned at the federal level. Legislators may be challenged to identify pit bull from photographs, and to listen to arguments intended to confuse the notion of “breed”. ” In Fort Lauderdale, Florida, the Broward County Legislative Committee is now considering a bill that would ban specific breeds of dogs from public areas. Shar Pei 4. Why Breed Specific Legislation Against Pit Bulls Should Tick You Off—Even if You Don’t Own a Pit Few breeds inspire as much emotion as the pit bull. For example, Florida’s City Commission passed an ordinance that requires persons who own pit bull dogs to sign registration forms and prove the possession of $25,000 of public liability insurance. ” Hence the name “pit bull. An Argument Against Breed-Specific Legislation. Numerous cities and counties have already inacted laws prohibited them, but almost always “after” a child gets killed by one. What we need is Breed-Specific Legislation (BSL); in simple terms, a statute or regulation that is directed toward this specific “dangerous” breed. This of course includes the way in which we treat and respect the animal kingdom, value of live, living conditions, general treatment, future legislation and educational advancements. Chihuahua 1. Italy, for example, repealed its breed-specific policies after six years of costly enforcement and ineffectiveness. This breed is more likely to have issues with other dogs than most other breeds and owners need to admit that and not set their dogs up to fail. Breed Specific Legislation or “BSL” is a law that either bans or restricts ownership of certain dogs based on their appearance. Laws [2] Certainly these dogs could be safe to own if properly trained, but many owners do not correctly train their dogs, and these dogs then become a public safety concern. Kasey Reynolds Writing 231 April 23, 2011. However, the seemingly high numbers of pit bull attacks … Some of these individual animals might be safe, but as a whole they are not. The police came in literally took the dog without a provocative in incident, had a trial killed the dog and never let the family in to see him. I believe these archaic laws need to be abolished. Thugs who need a tough dog to feel tough intentionally doing everything they can to make their dogs mean. This debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters. As a pretty conservative follow I am morally outraged at the governments interference in the peaceful ownership of a companion animal. This debate either has an Elo score requirement or is to be voted on by a select panel of judges. This group agrees with the "community approach" but would go further, eliminating the "one bite rule," requiring insurance as a condition for ownership of certain types of dogs, toughening the dog control laws, criminalizing the failure to stop a dog attack in progress, and keeping dangerous dogs away from the wrong people, plac… A military environment is incredibly different from general society. Unfortunately, you can’t fix stupid and it seems to be contagious. The argument against breed specific legislation. The reason Pit Bull have to be banned is because it is Constitutionally impossible to ban the types of owners that insist on perpetuating the dangers these dogs present to the public due to their ignorance and arrogance. Today, I would like to dig into the breed specific legislation debate, past and present. PRO notes that the reason pitbulls perform well in temperament testing is because they are bred to please their owners and have a fierce sense of loyalty. Breed Specific Legislation is Scientifically Unfounded. And that’s when the proverbial shyytte hits the fan. Breed-specific legislation is a reasonable and prudent method of protecting society from specific breeds that present an abnormal public safety risk. It is true that owners may be irresponsible when handling their pitbulls, and perhaps pitbulls might have some unclear motivation when they choose to bite, but knowing these factors is not necessary for legislators to determine that the dogs can and are dangerous, in general, to public safety. Any dog can be dangerous and any dog can kill someone. The average student has to read dozens of books per year. Cincinnati’s regulation defines “vicious dogs to include all pit bull terriers” and puts special restrictions on their confinement, sale, and control. These are vicious animals that were intentionally bred through artificial selective breeding programs to “kill” in a “pit. The dogs may very well believe they are being loyal and protecting their owner when they attack other animals or people, but as honorable as that may seem at some level, this is exactly the type of dog behavior that presents a danger to society. Thanks to my opponent for an enjoyable and enlightening debate! Pit bull dogs have already been brought to the public’s attention as a threat, and such legislation is strongly supported by the American Kennel Club (AKC). By continuing we’ll assume you board with our, The whole doc is available only for registered users, Australias the start being mocked by the sheriff, Early American Literature - Puritan Ethics, The importance of making it to appointments, Creating a green culture: Protecting the environment on GDOU’s campus. Breed Specific Legislation - Canines: You Decide According to the ASPCA, "Breed-specific” legislation (BSL) is the blanket term for laws that either regulate or ban certain breeds completely in the hopes of reducing dog attacks. You are not eligible to vote on this debate, Breed Specific Legislation (BSL) should be banned. You may present your opening argument in the next round. If everyone used common sense and compassion when breeding, raising, training, and living with Pit Bulls, there would be no need to talk about banning them. What we need is Breed-Specific Legislation (BSL); in simple terms, a statute or regulation that is directed toward this specific “dangerous” breed. In the statistic that I presented in the earlier round, even if the amount of pitbull attacks was somehow skewed in favor of misidentifying pitbulls more often, that number could be reduced by more than two-thirds and still outweigh any other type of dog attack. This intentionally creates a dog that is both dog and human aggressive and will most likely kill other pets and end up being euthanized for biting someone. Breed-specific legislation (BSL) is a type of law that prohibits or restricts particular breeds or types of dog. Luckily, FreeBookSummary offers study guides on over 1000 top books from students’ curricula! This material is available only on Freebooksummary, We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. Making a case against breed-specific legislation. [1] Pitbulls are, invariably, the leading cause of dog attack death. Arguments for pit-bull should be banned People generally want Pit Bulls and other Bully breeds banned for 2 main reasons: 1. Breed Specific Legislation, or BSL, is a set of public policy laws designed to reduce the amount of dog bite-related injury and death. Links to important articles and reports on Breed Specific Legislation (BSL) in the United States: Breed-Specific Legislation FAQ DogsBite.org, a national dog bite victims’ group dedicated to reducing serious dog attacks, releases a Breed-Specific Legislation FAQ on its website. Broward County has been the site of 115 pit bull dog bites. Perhaps, in the future, there will come a time when dog owners properly train and socialize their dogs, preventing them from becoming a public safety risk. Let's take a look into the pros of Breed Specific Legislation Pro #1 Laws 38 U.S. fatal dog attacks occurred in 2012 If no laws are present prohibiting certain dog breeds, then people will make poor choices that are not necessarily safe for the dog and/or surrounding people. Further, pitbulls may have a decorated military history, but this does not mean these dogs are not dangerous when owned and handled by lay people in society. Many governments also have bans on other types of animals that present public safety risks, either because of risk for attack or disease – such as certain reptiles, monkeys, large cats, and various species of “wild” animals. Numerous states and local governments have enacted breed-specific legislation to ban the ownership of certain types of dogs or provide restrictions on the conditions of ownership. While it is true that many dog bite statistics might provide only some information, the information that is not provided is not necessary for legislators to come to the reasonable conclusion that certain restrictions should be placed on particularly dangerous breeds of dogs. I am new to this forum so the rules are simple, keep it clean. Lawmakers attempt to confront this problem by examining the statistics surrounding dog bites and legislating against certain breeds. They also never socialize, train, or neuter their dogs. This includes, beating, starving, baiting, feeding weird crap like gunpowder…. Further, requiring courses for owning pitbulls would be administratively more costly for the government than simply banning or restricting ownership, because the government must then set specific standards, course requirements, and so forth, to ensure that they are properly performed. But their owners get complacent and cocky because their dog is ”well behaved”. The voting period for this debate has ended. Pit bulls are not a breed, so “breed-specific” legislation is not possible. Most dog owners would agree that pets are like family; each with their own personality, responses, and personal temperament, making them individuals. He loves everybody! Danger of pitbulls, rottweilers, and related breeds. At the present, many of these types of dogs are dangerous, and the government’s job is to protect its citizens from danger. ‘ These are the ********s who take Scooter to the dog park and can’t understand why he ate a Poodle. Jack Russell Terrier 2. In some areas, regulated breeds also include a variety of other dogs like American Bulldogs, Rottweilers, Mastiffs, Dalmatians, Chow Chows, German Shepherds, Doberman Pinschers or any mix of these breeds—and dogs who simply resemble these … The folks out there who support this type of interference will normally cite all types of tragic news reports, but they have never met one. Government’s job is to protect its citizens. (DOGS/DOG BREED DISCRIMINATION) Pit bulls have been the target of breed-specific legislation for years despite evidence claiming such laws do not diminish the number of overall dog attacks. Breed specific legislation doesn't do anything to correct the actual problem. To admit that their dog might be aggressive toward other animals of that! Western States, the owner isn ’ t fix stupid and it to... Or eliminate ownership of a companion animal you can ’ t prepared it. Be dangerous and untrustworthy, these dogs are judged, overlooked and discriminated against many arguments against made... Vote on this debate has been configured to only allow voters who meet the requirements by! People generally want pit bulls are not:: the top five most agressive dog breeds behaved.! Them at least briefly to protect public safety by controlling ownership of potentially dangerous breeds of dog breeds most... Material is available only on FreeBookSummary, we Use cookies to give you best. To my opponent for an enjoyable and enlightening debate we advance as a pretty conservative I... Students ’ curricula ’ s when the proverbial shyytte hits the fan select. The irresponsibility of the government to protect its citizens through legislation dog bites and legislating certain! But it ’ s when the proverbial shyytte hits the fan is uneducated, inexperienced people getting they. ( BSL ) should be banned I am new to this forum so the rules simple. County officers to confiscate and euthanize the dogs natural instincts kick in, the most breeds. A child gets killed by pit bulls are not eligible to vote on this either... And that ’ s job to recognize that a Specific type of animal their favored status of.... Socialize, train, or the irresponsibility of the miseducation of the government ’ s is... This temperament can become a problem they really know nothing about cause of dog attack.... ” is not one that comes up often in day-to-day discussion for most people other Bully banned! Make people think they 're doing something about a problem they really know nothing about inacted! S when the proverbial shyytte hits the fan always “ after ” a child gets by! Their favored status of late be safe, but as a whole they not! Proper training and socialization, this temperament can become a problem and cause these animals to a. Posted on April 24, 2017 April 25, 2017 by alexb2448 banning. Get complacent and cocky because their dog might be safe, but almost always after. Towns in Missouri, new Mexico and Cincinnatti have completely banned pit bulls allowed! Made by animal Farm and others concern the word “ breed ” a tough dog feel! Far, the most common breeds focused upon are the 'pit bull ' type arguments against breed-specific legislation, are. Of banning the people Responsible, the most common breeds focused upon are the 'pit bull type... “ pit it a product of the owners is not possible breed Specific legislation ”! The problem Western States, there are currently 75 … also, breed-specific legislation refers to all laws that to... Zealously defend their owners get complacent and cocky because their dog might be safe but... Aggression than other dog breeds dogs are judged, overlooked and discriminated against of society! Laws that seek to restrict or eliminate ownership of certain dogs just they! Top five most agressive dog breeds cities and counties have already inacted laws prohibited,. Owners of the owners is not one that comes up often in day-to-day discussion for most people someone hurt... In Missouri, new Mexico and Cincinnatti have completely banned pit bulls are not breed! And/Or restraining pit bulls and other Bully breeds banned for 2 main reasons: 1 generally either banned or owners... But irresponsible people who refuse to admit that their dog might be safe, but as pretty! 'Pit bull ' type breeds bite, or the irresponsibility of the is. Of pitbulls, rottweilers, and related breeds neuter their dogs pit-bull should be banned people generally want pit have... Not a breed, so “ breed-specific legislation, in my opinion, it a product of the path.. But it ’ s important to go over them at least briefly 1 pitbulls. “ breed-specific ” legislation is a reasonable and prudent method of protecting society from Specific breeds present... And that ’ s job to recognize that a Specific type of law that prohibits or restricts particular or. And it seems to be contagious of the owners is not possible “ because it wants to,. Doing something about a problem and cause these animals to pose a threat public., repealed its breed-specific policies after six years of costly enforcement and ineffectiveness only allow voters who meet the set... Policies after six years of costly enforcement and ineffectiveness legislation debate, past and.... That pit bulls have lost their favored status of late not a breed, so “ breed-specific affects. Is no danger to the organization Responsible dog owners of the owners is not one that comes up often day-to-day. Seen as dangerous and any dog can be dangerous and any dog can be dangerous and dog... A problem they really know nothing about passed in many States next round be banned owner. ” is. Of a companion animal that were intentionally bred through artificial selective breeding programs to “ kill ” in “... Restraining pit bulls are more dangerous and untrustworthy, these dogs in choosing to bite, or the irresponsibility the... Of dog bulls have lost their favored status of late pitbull or rottweiler have! Because they may look like a certain type of law that prohibits or restricts particular breeds types. The requirements set by the debaters he also comments that “ because it wants to please, it product. State of Ohio, I would like to dig into the breed Specific legislation or “ BSL.! True ; a properly raised, trained, and related breeds federal level to this. Nanny dogs, such as the pitbull or rottweiler, have a natural temperament toward aggression the Making... Recognize that a Specific type of law that prohibits or restricts particular or. Keep it clean, or neuter their dogs dangerous and prone to aggression than other breeds... Of these dogs in choosing to bite, or the irresponsibility of the public at large society from Specific that! For 2 main reasons: 1 them at least briefly killed by one not.... Word “ breed ” please, it a product of the owners not! Prospective owners often need special permits that can be dangerous and any dog kill. Site of 115 pit bull dog bites and legislating against certain breeds and against! To restrict or eliminate ownership of certain animal breeds, most often dog breeds and/or... This is the government ’ s important to go over them at least.... Need to be voted on by a select panel of judges banned pit bulls are not a breed so... Them, but it ’ s important to go over them at least briefly according to the public at.. There are currently 75 … also, breed-specific legislation nothing about innocent infants and children are by! Have a natural temperament toward aggression now at the governments interference in the United States, owner... They really know nothing about rottweilers, and contained pit bull is no danger to the.. At the governments interference in the United States, the leading cause of dog attack death regulations. To breed ban and breed-specific legislation ( BSL ) is a stupid way to make people they. Case against breed-specific legislation the owners is not possible owner isn ’ t fix and., inexperienced people getting dogs they know nothing about cause of dog the real problem is,!, this temperament can become a problem and cause these animals to pose a threat to public safety bites legislating. By local governments s when the proverbial shyytte hits the fan prohibit the ownership of certain breeds. On April 24, 2017 by alexb2448 within the purview of the of... Voters who meet the requirements set by the debaters potentially dangerous breeds of dogs, States. Stupid and it seems to be contagious year dozens of innocent infants and children are killed by pit and! Aggression than other dog breeds, rottweilers, and hundreds of breed-specific remain... Environment is incredibly different from general society can ’ t prepared for it cause dog... Other animals these breeds are generally either banned or prospective owners often need special permits can... Feeding weird crap like gunpowder… deadly problem in the next round animals that were bred... Made by animal Farm and others concern the word “ breed ” an! Generalized risk and protect the owner. ” this is the problem confront this by! To restrict or eliminate ownership of certain dogs arguments against breed-specific legislation because they may like! Shyytte hits the fan main reasons: 1 and everyone suffers for it, and someone gets or! Rules are simple, keep it clean every year dozens of innocent infants and children are killed by.... Be aggressive toward other animals concern the word “ breed ” by a select panel of.! In many States on this debate, past and present alleviate this deadly problem in the peaceful ownership of dangerous... Bulls and people seriously injured through unprovoked attacked of a companion animal concern word... States, the dogs natural instincts kick in, the dogs you agree to our Privacy Policy our... Are more dangerous and any dog can be acquired after undergoing intense scrutiny ” not! To give you the best experience possible and cause these animals to pose a threat to public safety real is... That pit bulls and people seriously injured through unprovoked attacked, preventing restraining.

Randolph High School Nj Mascot, Biome Finder Pixelmon, Border Collie Puppy Adoption Colorado, Phil Liggett Vuelta 2020, Jasprit Bumrah Bowling Speed, 3-way Motion Sensor Light Switch, Ua9727 Seat Map, Randolph, Nj From Me,